Refugov
#

Conference content

From 26 to 28 April 2021, we organised an international online academic conference on the topic of camps across the world. It involved 25 presentations from renowned and emergent scholars and researchers working on the topic of camps in multiple case studies throughout the globe. The majority of presentations dealt with refugee camps and asylum seekers reception centres. Some presentations also addressed refugee accommodation, migrant camps, as well as the ‘campisation’ of ethnic minorities, neighbourhoods and even whole regions.

The aim of the conference was to establish a global dialogue between research addressing the management of refugee camps in the global South and the management of reception centres in the global North. In doing this, the conference intended to overcome the North/South divide existing in academic research in camp and refugee studies. Our aim was also to consider camps in relation to their local and global environments. During the conference, participants discussed the specificities of the local production of camps across the world, as well as the shared features and global relations.

Hereunder you may read the abstracts of the presentations, and watch the video recordings of some papers.

Schedule

  • Day 1
    • Introduction and Keynote

    • BREAK

    • Panel 2 : Camp spatialities

    • BREAK

    • Panel 2 : Camp spatialities

    • BREAK

  • Day 2
    • Panel 3: Camps and cities I

    • BREAK

    • Panel 5 : Camps and cities II

    • BREAK

    • Panel 5 : Camps and cities II

    • BREAK

  • Day 3
    • Panel 6 : Local approaches to camps fragmentation, inclusion and resistance

    • BREAK

    • Panel 8 : Political economy of camps

    • BREAK

    • Panel 8 : Political economy of camps

    • BREAK

    • Concluding remarks

PROGRAMME

  • Day 1
  • Day 2
  • Day 3

Introduction and Keynote

Introduction: Lucas Oesch and Léa Lemaire (University of Luxembourg)

Keynote: Jonathan Darling (Durham University)
Refugee reception and the challenge of ‘the local’

Break

Introduction and Keynote

Introduction: Lucas Oesch and Léa Lemaire (University of Luxembourg)

Keynote: Jonathan Darling (Durham University)
Refugee reception and the challenge of ‘the local’

Break

Introduction and Keynote

Introduction: Lucas Oesch and Léa Lemaire (University of Luxembourg)

Keynote: Jonathan Darling (Durham University)
Refugee reception and the challenge of ‘the local’

Break

Presentations

Refugee reception and the challenge of ‘the local’ Jonathan Darling (Durham University)

What camps can do? Disspossession and inhabitation Camillo Boano and Hanadi Samhan (University College London)

Paraphrasing Deleuze, this paper is an attempt ask ‘what camps can do?’ However you wish to define them, semantically represent the paradoxical encounters between a series of governmental forces, disciplinary knowledge, aesthetic regimes and spatial conditions that tend to arrest, fix in time and space forms of lives. As starting point, the camp remains a rare object of study that can exist, simultaneously, in the realm of theory, in the space of matter and in the form of multiple agency. It is an ideological thought and a formal dispositive, one that antagonises the spatial precepts of modernism through its heavily loaded political semantics. Beside the wide spectrum of camp-like typologies, is in its bare essence a dispositif that explicitly determine the other, the unknown and the uncontrolled in what Mezzadra and Neilson, called “the different assemblages of power and the different forces of capital through which they are fragmented, recombined and produced”. Using somehow playfully the concepts of ‘dispossession’ developed by Butler and Athanasiou and the one of the ‘pluriverse’ developed by Escobar, I would like to stress two different but interconnected points: on one side, I hope to rescue Agamben’s work from its linear reading by commenting on the depoliticization of the camp and the critique of its exceptionalism; and, on the other, I wish to reflect around the urban- camp debate, introducing the disruptive terminology of inhabitation. With narratives from Middle East, Asia and Europe the paper wish to start grasping the possibility to decolonialise camp scholarship.

Scientific committee

Lucas Oesch (University of Luxembourg)
Léa Lemaire (University of Luxembourg) `
Birte Nienaber (University of Luxembourg)
Jonathan Darling (Durham University)
Ayham Dalal (TU Berlin)

Refugov Newsletter